Wednesday, August 16, 2017

Taltos by Anne Rice

I finally finished re-reading The Mayfair Witches Trilogy. I feel as if I put off this last book because there was nothing drawing me to it. I didn't remember what happened, and was pretty sure that nothing jaw-dropping was within its pages. I was right.

This trilogy definitely fades as the books go on in excitement and depth of character. I feel as if the characters you meet in the first two books, who are so vivid, dim considerably in Taltos, and while the mythology of the series is fully flushed out, it's missing the combination of history and character development that shapes the other two books.

Everyone is second-guessing themselves in Taltos or simply out of their mind. Frankly, it's annoying. These are all characters who have seen so much, who know so much of the story, who are able to make definitive decisions and take immediate action - what's happened to them? Maybe Rice shouldn't have wrapped up so much of her story, maybe she should have left more pieces open-ended. I certainly feel she should have left more conflict than we ended up getting.

There's not much to say for this book. Most of the plot points to share would create spoilers for the story. All I can say is that everyone gets what's coming to them and all the fear we're left with from The Witching Hour and Lasher is heavily tempered by the end of Taltos so that you don't really care what's next for the characters you've followed through the series. It's still an amazingly intricate story that's worth reading, but maybe don't feel guilty if you pass on the third installment.

Wednesday, May 31, 2017

The Circle by Dave Eggers

This is a terrifying story. It's so disturbing in so many ways, yet it lacks the stereotypical components of a thriller - there's not really much suspense. It reads like a matter-of-fact piece of fiction where the world of the story is presented and we're given insight into the lives of a few characters. It's an interesting duality.

So, why am I so freaked out?

Because it could actually happen.

At the root of The Circle is the concept of privacy. Are we really entitled to it? In this technologically-driven age so we really need it? Couldn't full transparency solve all the world's problems? The employees at The Circle believe so as they endeavor to destroy everyone's right to privacy (because it's like keeping a secret from the world.) By encouraging its employees to think up and then develop new software to bring people together and/or keep tabs on certain people, the company is quickly growing into the sole owner of information, and most everyone, somehow, feels like this is a good move. This is what completely freaks me out, the idea that I could live in a world where I owned none of my own information, where I wasn't in control of who knew what about me as a private citizen. Actually...what's worse is thinking of a world where it's acceptable to demand full transparency from everyone. That expectation alone feels unethical and dangerous, not to mention a little stalkerish.

But, that's the ultimate goal of these 'circlers' - opening up the world - and Mae quickly becomes the star employee espousing this mission no matter what it costs those closest to her. From humble beginnings as a customer service rep, Mae rises in the ranks to become the first fully-transparent employee at The Circle. Wearing a camera on her chest pretty much all the time, she's only allowed to turn it on for brief periods to use the bathroom. If she takes too long, her viewers get testy. She becomes a live You Tube channel more or less giving the world insight into The Circle. 

Mae ends up taking massive swigs of the company Kool-Aid forcing transparency on her parents and ex-boyfriend in a way that makes their lives unbearable, and Mae simply can't understand why they can't handle it. Shouldn't everyone want to share every moment of their life with the world? Aren't they doing the world a disservice by keeping secrets? This mentality of the world having a right to know is taken beyond an acceptable limit with frightening consequences.

By the end of the book, I was left with the icky feeling of having just witnessed the brainwashing of an entire society all in the name of technology (and no such thing as TMI.) Getting passed the fear imposed by the subject matter, the story is a fully flushed-out journey with such a colorful variety of characters making things interesting, eventful, and surprising. This is a good read for the summer, but don't agree too much with the "great" ideas coming from 'circlers.' You don't want to complete the circle.

Tuesday, April 11, 2017

Console Wars: Sega, Nintendo, and the Battle that Defined a Generation by Blake J. Harris

I loved this book for two reasons. Firstly, the nostalgia factor. I was a kid of the generation defined by the introduction of home gaming systems. We got our first Nintendo one year for Hanukkah and it changed everything. Throughout my childhood, Mario, Luigi, Sonic, Eco, and so many more characters impacted conversations and culture. This story is part of my story, so it was so very interesting to follow the timeline of productivity and technological evolution. Secondly, business and marketing practices before the advent of social media are simply fascinating to me. How people built products and conceptualized strategies to get consumers interested, especially in such a competitive landscape as the gaming industry, is so varied and intricate that it's exciting to read about. So essentially, this book let me 'nerd out' in two totally different ways, making it a great non-fiction read for my generation.

The other aspect to this book that made it engaging, content aside, was the style in which it was written. Rather than simply report the facts or tell the story, Harris took on a narrative approach to the content so you feel as if you're reading fiction when you're not. It built anticipation, let you connect better with the people in the story, and allowed a long timeline of events to flow quickly and seamlessly.

A lot happens in the story of Nintendo, Sega, and Sony (Playstation) during the 80's and 90's when video games and gaming consoles become something individuals can own in their home. The sense of competition and one-upping each other created a rivalry where anything was okay in the name of success. Primarily Nintendo and Sega went at each other as best they could to be the top gaming company and the scales tipped in both directions over the years, although Nintendo ultimately won. That wasn't a surprise. The surprise lay in learning more about how each company ran their business. What obstacles they faced from a corporate perspective, how much timing meant in the game, and who the key players really were.

After reading this book, I wanted to sit down with the then-head of Sega and just have coffee. I wanted to write a nasty letter to the then-leaders at Nintendo for their strict business practices, and I wanted to chastise people (no longer at) Sony for being too over the top. It was a race full of cheap jabs and powerful marketing campaigns, but the competition between these companies shaped the way we know personal gaming. They pushed each other to do better - create better graphics in games, better consoles - to continually innovate. It's a powerful story on the power of healthy competition.

There's not much story to summarize, since you should, by now, know at least part of this story from your own experience as you go to turn on your gaming console of choice in your own living room or man cave. But, the whole story is worth a read, so I highly recommend this title for just about everyone who loves a video game.

Friday, February 3, 2017

Harry Potter and the Cursed Child Parts 1 & 2 by J.K.Rowling, et. al.

It was wonderful to head back into the world of Harry Potter, although I did put off reading this book. As much as I love this series, I wasn't sure reading a script (vs a fully descriptive narrative,) would do it for me, but thanks to the imagery already established in the original books and movies, Harry's world is already so vivid, I was able to fill in the narrative blanks myself to complete the picture of this story.

At this point, Harry is a busy, working dad still grappling with residual fame from defeating Lord Voldemort. His middle child, Albus, is struggling as well, living in his father's shadow and viewing himself as the 'imperfect' son. It makes sense. One can easily imagine how hard it would be living in the shadow and dealing with the immense expectations of an extremely famous father. It gets worse for Albus when he's sorted into Slytherin and becomes best friends with Draco Malfoy's son. Both boys feel like outcasts as a result of their parents. How could they not bond together? Their solution, however to remedy this issue leads to an assortment of problems. Messing with time always leads to problems when you're not careful, especially when you radically change the past. 

I won't give anything else away as far as the radical events that take place as the boys mess with the timeline we've come to know, because there's something else at the heart of this book. Beyond the excitement and adventure set into motion by one, little time turner are two very powerful and universal themes: the past shapes who we are, and we cannot change that, and parents and children can find common ground to form a connection with each other no matter how out-of-reach it may feel.

I found this story more powerful than the novels. Maybe because, as a script, it was forced to be concise and tell a succinct story rather than get caught up in the descriptions of a narrative. I really enjoyed the play and haven't read anything so quickly in a long time. 

This is a must-read, if you haven't read it already, for all Harry Potter fans, especially those who have been missing the wizarding world.